Amber Heard’s legal professional has stated social media posts “influenced” the jury in Johnny Depp’s lawsuit in opposition to his former spouse, including that her consumer can not have enough money the $10m (£8m) awarded in damages.
Elaine Bredehoft made the remarks an afternoon after Depp received the high-profile case in opposition to his ex-wife, with the court docket awarding the actor $10m in compensatory damages.
She stated she believes the jury may no longer get away the serious and “lopsided” social media frenzy surrounding the trial.
“How are you able to no longer? They went house each and every night time. They have got households. The households are on social media,” she instructed NBC.
“We had a 10-day ruin within the center as a result of the judicial convention. There is no means they could not were influenced by means of it,” she stated.
When requested if her consumer would be capable to pay the $10m in compensatory damages, Ms Bredehoft responded: “Oh no, completely no longer.”
Ms Bredehoft described the social media protection as “terrible”, including that she hostile having cameras within the court docket.
“It is just like the Roman Colosseum, you realize? How they considered this entire case,” she stated.
“I used to be in opposition to cameras within the court docket, and I went on document with that and argued in opposition to it as a result of the delicate nature of this. Nevertheless it made it a zoo.”
Ms Bredehoft stated that once the decision, Heard instructed her that she was once “so sorry to all the ones ladies in the market” and stated the end result was once “a setback for all ladies in and outdoor the court docket”.
She stated the Aquaman actor “feels the load of that”.
The legal professional stated the decision sends a “terrible message”.
“Except you pull out your telephone and also you video your partner or your vital different beating you, successfully you will not be believed,” she added.
Depp had sued Heard for $50m (£38.2m) over a piece of writing printed in The Washington Publish in December 2018, wherein she referred to herself as “a public determine representing home abuse”.
Heard‘s column didn’t point out Depp by means of title, however he argued it was once an instance of “defamation by means of implication” as a result of portions of the column referred to allegations of abuse she made in opposition to him following their break-up in 2016.
How has on-line abuse of Amber Heard transform applicable?
Heard had issued a counter-claim for $100m (£76.4m) over statements calling her allegations a “hoax” made by means of her ex-husband’s legal professional that have been printed in Mail On-line tales in 2020.
Depp was once no longer in court docket on Wednesday, however the jury awarded him $15m (£11.9m) in damages – $10m in compensatory damages and $5m (£4m) in punitive damages.
Alternatively Fairfax County Circuit Pass judgement on Penney Azcarate diminished the punitive damages awarded to Depp to $350,000 in step with the state’s prison restrict, making his overall damages $10.4m.
Heard stated she’s going to enchantment the decision, which a court docket in Virginia delivered on Wednesday.