Depp v Heard are living: ‘You’ll be able to die a fats, lonely previous guy’ – New witness unearths main points of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard’s unstable arguments | Ents & Arts Information

Posted on

Depp’s workforce now take their flip to query officer Melissa Saenz.

She is requested whether or not a safety guard confirmed them as much as the rental, and she or he says that whilst safety guards allow them to in and gave them get admission to, they didn’t escort them as much as the rental.

Depp’s attorney asks: “Did you spot the rest that made you imagine against the law or an act of home violence were dedicated?” She says no, she didn’t.

The officer says it was once a neighbour who known as the police, and that “a generic white male” replied the rental door to her.

Depp’s attorney asks how intently she was once status to Heard when chatting with her within the hallway, and she or he says two to 5 ft. She additionally says the hallway was once smartly lit. She is requested if she noticed any accidents on Ms Heard, and says she didn’t. The attorney asks if she has ever “worn corrective lenses” and she or he says she has now not, her eyesight is just right.

She says on wondering, Heard “was once uncooperative”, clarifying that she would ask her questions and “she would now not say the rest”. She says she requested her questions to determine whether or not there was once some type of crime, however she would now not solution. She says at one level she requested the male on the rental to enter the corridor together with her male colleague, in case that may assist the placement, however mentioned it didn’t and nonetheless nobody would give her any knowledge.

Officer Saenz says she then performed “a protecting sweep” of 2 of the penthouses to test there have been “no doable suspects” or “injured sufferers” throughout the location. She says she was once accompanied through her colleague and the “generic white male”. She says all through the penthouse protecting sweeps she didn’t “see, or pay attention the rest that made her suppose against the law were dedicated or an act of home violence had befell”.

She says all through her interviews with Heard she “was once continuously scanning” her and didn’t see any proof of harm. She says she believes she had a lot of time to resolve whether or not or now not she had sustained any accidents and decided that she had now not. She consents that she had no less than two separate conversations with Heard, and that she was once two to 5 ft from her – “proper in entrance of me”. She is requested whether or not at any time limit Heard complained of any accidents, and she or he says she didn’t. She additionally says she noticed “no indicators of disarray” in both of the penthouses she walked thru. 

Depp’s attorney once more asks whether or not at this level or inside of “the whole lot of her time on the incident” whether or not she had “noticed, or heard the rest that made her suppose against the law were dedicated or an act of home violence had befell”. Once more, she says she didn’t.

The officer reiterates that “I had by no means heard of Amber Heard at the moment” and “did  now not recognise any of the folk at that incident”. She says on the time she had no explanation why to imagine that “any person there was once well-known”. She says she additionally had no explanation why to imagine that “Johnny Depp was once affiliated or attached to the incident by any means.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.