Johnny Depp v Amber Heard: Jury in defamation trial despatched out to believe its verdicts | US Information

Posted on

The jury within the multi-million buck defamation trial between Johnny Depp and his ex-wife Amber Heard has been despatched out to believe its verdicts.

Heard, who claims Depp bodily and sexually assaulted her, is being sued through the Hollywood actor for $50m over an editorial she wrote in The Washington Publish in 2018 through which she described herself as “a public determine representing home abuse”.

Heard, 36, has countersued her ex-husband for $100m after his attorney known as her allegations a hoax.

See newest updates from the courtroom as final arguments made – apply updates

The Pirates of the Caribbean big name, 58, insists he by no means struck Heard and that she made up the abuse claims to realize a bonus in divorce complaints.

On the finish of the six-week trial in Virginia on Friday, Depp’s criminal group requested the jury “to present Mr Depp his lifestyles again” through discovering that Heard dedicated libel.

“This example for Mr Depp hasn’t ever been about cash,” mentioned Depp’s attorney Benjamin Chunk.

“It’s about Mr Depp’s recognition and liberating him from the jail through which he has lived for the closing six years.”

Mr Chunk additionally mentioned: “We implore you to present him his identify, his recognition and his profession again.”

Every other of Depp’s legal professionals, Camille Vasquez, mentioned that whilst Heard’s first-person written piece didn’t point out the actor’s identify, it used to be obviously relating to him.

Actor Johnny Depp reacts as he testifies in the courtroom during his defamation trial against his ex-wife Amber Heard, at the Fairfax County Circuit Courthouse in Fairfax, Virginia, U.S., May 25, 2022. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/Pool
Symbol:
Actor Johnny Depp reacts as he testifies within the court docket. Pic: REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/Pool

She informed jurors that in the back of the scenes of Depp and Heard’s courting, issues have been very other.

‘There may be an abuser on this court docket, however it isn’t Mr Depp’

“There may be an abuser on this court docket, however it isn’t Mr Depp. And there’s a sufferer of home abuse on this court docket, however it isn’t Ms Heard,” she mentioned.

Heard’s attorney, Benjamin Rottenborn, mentioned the lawsuit used to be no longer about Depp’s recognition however used to be a part of an ongoing smear marketing campaign Depp introduced after Heard filed for divorce.

Actor Amber Heard testifies during the Depp vs Heard defamation trial at the Fairfax County Circuit Court in Fairfax, Virginia, U.S. May 26, 2022. Michael Reynolds/Pool via REUTERS
Symbol:
Actor Amber Heard testifies all over the Depp vs Heard defamation trial. Pic: Michael Reynolds/Pool by the use of REUTERS

“In Mr Depp’s global, you do not depart Mr Depp,” he mentioned. “If you happen to do, he’ll get started a marketing campaign of worldwide humiliation towards you.”

He took the jury again to the testimony of knowledgeable psychologist Dr Break of day Hughes, who examined Heard and mentioned there have been a “top level” of violence towards the actress.

She mentioned the impact of “coercive keep watch over” used to be “drastic” and that there used to be an “imbalance of energy” and “intimidation”.

Dr Hughes informed the courtroom that Heard has post-traumatic tension dysfunction because of abuse.

Mr Rottenborn mentioned it used to be “ridiculous” that Depp used to be seeking to “idiot” the jury into believing he used to be by no means as soon as abusive in opposition to Heard.

“It isn’t about who is the simpler partner,” the attorney mentioned. “It isn’t about whether or not you assume Ms Heard could have been abusive to Mr Depp. It isn’t.”

‘It’s time to inform Mr Depp that this used to be his closing likelihood’

Mr Rottenborn added: “It’s time to inform Mr Depp that this used to be his closing likelihood. Inform him to transport on together with his lifestyles. Inform him to let Amber transfer on with hers.

“This trial is set so a lot more than Johnny Depp as opposed to Amber Heard. It is about freedom of speech. Rise up for it. Give protection to it. And reject Mr Depp’s claims towards Amber.”

Every other of Heard’s legal professionals, Elaine Bredehoft, mentioned the statements made through Depp’s legal professional Adam Waldman – which might be the rationale Heard is countersuing Depp – “took on a lifetime of its personal”.

Learn extra:
Kate Moss says actor ‘by no means driven me, kicked me or threw me down any stairs’
Actress’s sister says she noticed couple hit every different in 2015 struggle

Ms Bredehoft mentioned they’ve “adopted her in every single place” and that Heard has misplaced a number of paintings alternatives.

The Aquaman film used to be Heard’s “alternative”, her “blockbuster”, Ms Bredehoft mentioned, however because it used to be popping out, “the whole lot close down”.

She reminded the jury of earlier testimony through a professional who predicted the actress’s profession trajectory, announcing she can have earned as much as $50m within the following years “as a substitute of her big name being utterly extinguished”.

Ms Bredehoft mentioned the jury must also believe “emotional misery damages” and mentioned those are “much more excessive”.

“Each time she is known as a liar… it reasons her to relive it all,” Ms Bredehoft mentioned, including that the ordeal has “destroyed” Heard’s lifestyles and “fed on her”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.